题为教学伦理由苏珊传温迪Willingham同意我的观点的高中生的文章。文章说，学生不应该被道德绝对主义和相对主义的主题。道德绝对主义意味着只有一种道德是正确的。相对主义是错误的信念，如果某些道德是正确的一组或一个人，他们是正确的道德。基本上，这些偏见归结为一个事实，即没有任何不同的观点，当涉及到道德推理。有了道德推理，只有一个正确的答案。基本上，我们需要让学生知道有许多方法的推理，如果你碰到这些偏见，你应该问类是否有任何额外的建议或选项。文章接着说：“有一个真正的危险，教导青少年的方式忽视个人或道德发展，但完全集中在学术成就。青春期是一个动荡的时期，当年轻人需要指导“（21）加尔布雷思（1979）警告我们使用灌输，威权主义和相对主义。灌输和威权主义不允许学生探索他们的道德意识，而不是强迫他们接受或拒绝老师告诉他们的是真实的。相对主义也造成了学习的障碍，因为它破坏了系统的伦理哲学。它假设，因为它是正确的，你是正确的其他人。因此，它破坏了辩论之前，他们开始。我们需要做的是通过讨论来创造道德发展。
加拿大统计学论文代写:高中生的文章
The article entitled Teaching Ethics to High School Students by SUSAN PASS and WENDY WILLINGHAM agrees with my point. The article says that the student should not be sidetracked by topics of moral absolutism and relativism. Moral absolutism means that only one morality is correct. Relativism is the false belief that if certain ethics are right for one group or person they are correct morally. Basically these biases boil down to the fact that there are no different viewpoints when it comes to moral reasoning. With moral reasoning there is only one right answer. Basically we need to let the students know there are many ways of reasoning and if you bump into these biases you should ask the class if there are any additional suggestions or options. The article goes on and says "there is a real danger of teaching adolescents in a manner that ignores personal or moral development, but focuses entirely on academic achievement. Adolescence is a time of upheaval when young people need guidance" (21).Galbraith (1979) warns us about using indoctrination, authoritarianism, and relativism. Indoctrination and authoritarianism do not allow the student to explore their sense of ethics, we instead force them to accept or reject what the instructor tells them is true. Relativism also creates a barrier to learning as it destroys systematic ethical philosophies. It assumes that because it is correct for you it is correct for everybody else. Thus it destroys the debates before they begin. What we need to do is to create moral development through discussion.