加拿大圭尔夫代写论文:保护女性免受性侵犯

7 年前 305次浏览 加拿大圭尔夫代写论文:保护女性免受性侵犯已关闭评论

另一种主张持枪的激进分子在校园里呼吁枪支,是为了保护女性免受性侵犯。他们认为,如果女性知道她们周围的女性可能也会武装起来,她们就不太可能攻击女性。此外,受害者可以有机会向攻击者开枪,前提是他们能够有效地使用它来保护自己。然而,可靠的社会科学研究表明,基于受害者通常对这些经历的反应,通过武装妇女使用枪支来解决校园性侵犯是行不通的。研究表明,89%的校园性侵犯涉及毒品和/或酒精(克雷布斯,林奎斯特和华纳)和90%的大学性侵犯是人知道(桑普森6)。在这种情况下,受害者可能很难拔枪的人交往或者当他们处于冻结状态由于药物、酒精或刺激性保定。即使在看了所有的证据之后,仍然有一些人认为校园里应该允许枪支。他们的论点可能是有效的,如果我们考虑到,如果一个人经过心理健康检查,进行了广泛的培训,并在获得执照前通过了所有的测试,那么他们的法律权利就会更广泛。如果每一个持枪证持有人经历了许多艰难的考试,以确定他/她是否有资格使用枪支,那将是一个理想的选择。然而,如今在许多州获得驾照比以前要容易得多,这就提出了一个问题,即那些执照持有人是否训练有素,是否精神稳定。

加拿大圭尔夫代写论文:保护女性免受性侵犯

Another argument gun right activists make to call for guns on campus is to protect women from sexual assaults. They argue perpetrators would less likely to attack women if they knew women around them might also be armed. Also, victims could have a chance to shoot attackers, assuming they would be able to use it effectively to protect themselves. However, reliable social science research indicates that based on the way victims typically react to these experiences, solving campus sexual assaults by arming women with firearms will not work. Studies show that 89 percent of campus sexual assaults involve drugs and/or alcohol (Krebs, Lindquist and Warner) and 90 percent of college sexual assaults are committed by someone the victim knows (Sampson 6). In such situations, victims would likely have a difficult time pulling out the gun to someone they associate with or when they are in frozen state due to drugs, alcohol or tonic immobility.Even after looking at all the evidence there are still people who believe that firearms should be allowed on campus. Their argument could be valid if we consider the broader legal rights to carry guns if one has gone through mental health screenings, had extensive trainings and passed all the tests before obtaining the license. It would be ideal if every gun license holder had gone through many difficult exams to determine if he/ she is qualified to use guns. However, it is easier than before to obtain a license in many states these days, raising the question if those license holders are well-trained and mentally stable or not.

这些您可能会感兴趣

筛选出你可能感兴趣的一些文章,让您更加的了解我们。