在内部武装冲突中，保护范围小于国际武装冲突，在此情况下，责任者的义务仅限于保护教育机构。国际机构已被授权在日内瓦公约中对犯罪行为进行起诉，特别是对教育机构的保护。国际社会日益认识到教育在危机形势下对社会进步的重要性。作为人道主义回应的一部分，越来越多的紧急教育被纳入其中。教育系统是受冲突影响国家中最可持续和最持久的解决方案之一。正如所讨论的，人道主义行动者已经介入，以满足平民教育的基本权利。一个长期的解决方案也将是建立当地社区和组织的能力，以确保他们能够自我可持续发展。对良好治理的投资，本质上是对人民的投资，可能是在紧急情况下提供教育的最好方式，因为它对儿童及其社区的未来进行了断言和投资。实施国家责任将迫使各州遵守人道主义法的规定，从而确保他们的武装部队遵守人道主义法。摘要国际刑事法院作为国家体系的补充，是国家履行人道主义法的职责，为其在本国法律体系内的违法行为提供刑事制裁。国际刑事法庭的存在给各国施加了压力，要求它们批准罗马规约下的罪行，并在其国内管辖范围内起诉国际犯罪，以避免国际刑事法庭的介入。国际刑事法庭的起诉将导致个人刑事责任。
加拿大北英属哥伦比亚代写论文:武装冲突
The scope of protection in an internal armed conflict is smaller than an international armed conflict, in that, the obligation of the duty bearers are limited to the protection of educational institutions. International institutions have been mandated with prosecuting crimes within the Geneva Conventions, in particular, the protection of educational institutions. The international community has increasingly recognise the importance of education in crises situations for the progress of the society. This is evidenced by the growing inclusion of emergency education as part of humanitarian response. Education systems are one of the most sustainable and durable solutions available in conflict affected States. As discussed, humanitarian actors have stepped in to meet the basic right of education of civilians. A long-term solution would also be to build the capacity of local communities and organisations to do so to ensure that they would be self-sustainable.[30] An investment in good governance, which in essence is an investment in people, may be the best way to provide education in emergency situations, because it asserts and invests in a future for children and their communities.Imposing State responsibility would force States to observe rules of humanitarian law and therefore, ensure that their armed forces observe humanitarian law. It is the duty of the State to implement humanitarian law and to provide criminal sanctions for its violations within its own legal system as the ICC acts as a supplement to national systems. The mere existence of the ICC has put pressure on States to ratify the crimes under the Rome Statute and to prosecute international crimes within their domestic jurisdiction to avoid the ICC's intervention. The prosecution by the ICC would incur individual criminal responsibility.