人们可以看到，单独分配责任既不能准确也不能有帮助。你必须意识到，当试图找出问题的根源时，责任也会发挥作用。它们是一样的。责任和责任是有区别的。老师、管理员、家长、社区，甚至孩子都要对学生的学习负责。这种责任源于这样一个事实，即所有这些政党都有义务确保学生的学习，并且从某种意义上说，这些政党都在一定程度上促进了学生的学习。但是，教师和学校系统管理员可以对学生的学习负责，因为公立学校系统是建立的，并且是公共资助的，以产生学生学习作为一个具体的结果。当我考虑到学校对学生学习的“责任”水平时，我有时会想到学校和家长之间的零和游戏，但这可能过于简单化了。举个例子，比如说，孩子A在今年的大部分课程中都不及格，谁负责呢?计算的责任的一种方法是,嗯,孩子生活在一个单亲妈妈,他从不工作很努力,他错过了很多天的一年,他的父母从来没有帮助他做家庭作业,他从来没有利用课后辅导的机会,所以他的失败是75%他和他父母的责任。另一方面，他的失败仅仅是他的老师和学校的责任的25%，因为他们提供了良好的教育机会;孩子A只是没有利用这个机会。
加拿大安大略理工代写论文:责任发挥作用
One can see that assigning responsibility alone can neither be accurate or helpful. You have to realize that accountability also comes into play when attempting to find the root of the problem. They are one in the same. There is a difference between responsibility and accountability. The teachers, administrators, parents, community, and even the children are responsible for student learning. This responsibility stems from the fact that there is an obligation on the part of all of those parties to ensure student learning, and in the sense that those parties all contribute to some extent to student learning. But the teachers and school system administrators can be held accountable for student learning based on the fact that public school systems are created and publicly funded to produce student learning as a specific outcome.When I think in terms of the level of "responsibility" that a school has for student learning, I sometimes think in terms of a zero-sum game between school and parents, but maybe that's too simplistic a formulation.For example, let's say that Child A fails most of his classes for the year-who's responsible? One way to calculate the responsibility is to say that, well, Child A lived with a single parent, he never worked very hard, he missed a lot of days over the course of the year, his parent never helped him with his homework, and he never took advantage of after-school tutoring opportunities, so his failure is 75% his and his parent's responsibility. On the other hand, his failure is only 25% the responsibility of his teacher and school, because they offered the opportunity for a good education; Child A just didn't take advantage of that opportunity.