进一步解释自己的主张的利益相关的卫生保健目标当讨论更广泛的观点像nation1的“健康”,他反驳认为,这有利于对老年因为优先级应该给那些将受益更多,因此,年轻也会越来越老的好处更减少了,这在道德上是不公正的,小老的好处应该首选大年轻的好处。为了支持他的观点，他解释说，年长的人可以被认为比福利更多，因为他们在生活中缴纳了更多的税，但相反，他回答说，通常医疗保健系统是一种社会保险系统，幸运的人可以得到更多。他还支持这一观点，即老年人更看重自己的小进步，而年轻人则更关注不同方面，如果谈论到他们的好处，在这种情况下，医疗保险制度作为社会保险制度的基本原理将处于危险之中，私人实体将更加关注。当我们处理公民美德和团结或社区价值时，比优先设置卫生保健的范例成为一个模型应用的困难。在这个层面上有不同的参考点，比如有效性、效率、合法性和分配合理性。如果我们将国家健康的概念转变为本文的另一种观点，那么就更容易衡量有效性，因为再生将被优先考虑。从经济角度来说，退行期会消耗更多的钱，这将证明艾伦基于社会保险的观点是正确的，即任何一个在他的生长期付钱的人都会在他的退行期得到补偿。从政治上讲，这两种情况都会有明显不同。例如，政府不必在长期护理设施上投入大量资金，而必须建立社区康复服务中心，供所有年龄层使用。老年人和年轻人的福利价值不会有太大差异，尽管福利价值会有差异，但这对扩大年龄群体是公平的。
加拿大留学生paper代写:卫生保健
In the further explanation of his own proposition of benefit related health care objectives when talk about broader view like “health of the nation1”, he counter argues that this favors against the old age because priorities should be given to those who will benefit more, so the young will get more and also in old age benefits are more diminished and that this is morally unjust that smaller benefits of older should be preferred on larger benefits of young. In support of his argument he explains that older can be considered more beyond the benefit because they have paid more taxes in their lives, but contrarily he replied that usually health care systems are social insurance kind of system in which lucky one gets more. He also supports this argument that elders value more to their small improvements while young focus more to different aspects if talk about their benefits in that case the rationale of health care settings as a social insurance setup will be in jeopardy and private entities will be focus more.When we deal with the civic virtues and solidarity or community values than the paradigm of priority setting for health care become difficult up to one model application. There are different references points to be deal at this level like, effectiveness, efficiency, legitimacy and distributive justification. If we change the notion of health of nation to the context of alternative idea of this paper than it will be easier to measure effectiveness as regenerative will be given priority. Economically7, the degenerative phase will consume more and it will justify the social insurance based argument of Alan that any person who pays in his regenerative phase will get in his degenerative part. Politically, there will be marked difference in both the scenarios. For example, instead of spending major share on long term care facility government have to build community rehabilitation services centers which will be utilized by all age groups. There won’t be any much difference of values of benefits of elders and young, though there will be difference in values of benefits but that will be equitable to widen age groups.
