因此，我们要问的问题是道德的方式生活，是否有可能否认过去的行为，但仍能以道德的方式生活，或者是否绝对有必要接受过去的罪行，而不去追究责任。种族灭绝的道德影响显而易见，但事实仍然是，土耳其政府首先对其公民负责，然后对世界其他地方负责。由于一个世纪前发生的事件而引发内战很可能被认为是不道德和不道德的，但是，完全否认这样的恶劣事件也不是一个道德上合理的立场。总之，知识的伦理影响肯定是巨大的。总的来说，衡量这种影响是不可能的，但人们肯定可以衡量知识一旦公开会产生的影响。虽然拥有知识总是带有一种伦理责任，但即使在康德的伦理体系中，也很难区分这种责任的范围和程度。虽然自然科学的知识几乎总是要共享的，但在AOK的其他领域，如历史、公民和地缘政治问题也会发挥作用，这将导致伦理灾难，可能比它们试图修复的灾难更大。最后，唯一不变的是，无论好坏，知识都是一种不可低估的强大工具。
加拿大社会学论文代写:道德的方式生活
The question to be asked, therefore, is whether it is possible to deny past actions and yet live morally, or whether it is absolutely necessary to accept one’s past guilt before once can be absolved of blame. The ethical impact of the genocide is plain to see, but the fact remains that the Turkish government has an ethical responsibility first towards its citizens and then to the rest of the world. To spark of a civil war due to events that took place a century ago may very well be considered unethical and immoral, but yet, to deny outright such egregious events is not a morally sound stance either.In conclusion, the ethical impact of knowledge is certainly vast. To measure this impact is, by and large, impossible, but one can certainly gauge the effect that knowledge once made public would have. While the possession of knowledge always carries with it an ethical responsibility, it is difficult to discern the scope and extent of this responsibility, even in a Kantian ethical system. While knowledge in the natural sciences must almost always be shared, in other AOK’s, such as history, civil and geopolitical issues come into play, which would lead to ethical catastrophes perhaps bigger than those that they try to repair. In the end, the only constant is that knowledge, for better or worse, is a powerful tool that must not be underestimated.
