这场辩论的最终问题是谁决定什么是对的还是错的？这是与社会地位，许多“谴责”语言是从社会群体比其他受过教育的中产阶级——职业人（Finegan，1980）。以R例如发音，Janet Holmes表示，即使有r-pronouncing没有好或坏，更多的中产阶级社区是教育缺乏幽默和明显的和别人认为好的演讲（福尔摩斯，2004）。虽然标准语言在印刷和文学方面是有用的，但说中产阶级的人的语言并不比其他社会群体的语言更好。像字典这样的语言参考是语言的一个例子，应该简单地引用，不是所有的社交场合都需要正式的说话方式，反之亦然。语言是一种性格的表达，是一个人的定义。你可以从他们的语言使用中获得很大的洞察力，不应该因为他们没有使用RP而皱眉，而是应该庆祝这个独特性。最终，没有一种语言是“错误的”，只是使用它的方式不同而已。
加拿大加拿大健康学论文代写:职业人
The ultimate question into this debate is who decides what is right or wrong? This has much to do with social standing, much of the "condemned" language comes from social groups other than the educated middle classes--professional people (Finegan, 1980). Take the pronunciation of r for example, Janet Holmes expresses that even though there is nothing good or bad about r-pronouncing, in more middle-class communities it is regarded as humorous and evident of lack of education and in others is deemed good speech (Holmes, 2004). Although a standard language is useful in terms of print and literature, it is not right to say that the language of middle-class speakers is not better than the language of other social groups. Language references such as dictionaries are an example of language and should simply be referenced, not all social situations require a formal way of speaking and vice versa. Language is an expression of character and defines a person. You can gain great insight into an individual from their use of language and should not be frowned upon because they aren't using RP but instead this uniqueness should be celebrated. Ultimately, there isn't such a thing as a "wrong" language just a different way of using it.
